Academic Program Review is an institution-wide evaluation process that incorporates systematic reviews of our institutional goals and results in continuous improvement of program quality. Academic Program Review is an essential component of such institutional effectiveness. Each doctoral program and stand-alone master’s program will undergo an external review at least once every ten years.
At The University of Texas at Dallas, the Academic Program Review process is coordinated by The Office of Graduate Education. The process involves the academic unit undergoing review, the Academic Senate’s Program Review Committee, the Review Team, The Office of Graduate Education, and the Provost’s Office.
Program Reviews provide us with an opportunity to highlight the many attributes of our programs and to discuss challenges with knowledgeable and experienced colleagues.
Texas Administrative Code Title 19, Part 1, Chapter 5, Subchapter C, Section 5.52 requires that public institutions of higher education have a process to review the quality and effectiveness of existing degree programs.
The process begins with an introductory meeting called by The Office of Graduate Education with the representatives from the unit to be reviewed. The introductory meeting will familiarize the unit with the Academic Review Process at The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) as well as help the unit prepare for the review. After the introductory meeting, the unit will consult with the Dean of the School and The Office of Graduate Education regarding suitable dates for the Review Team’s on-site campus visit. Once the dates are secured, The Office of Graduate Education will request a list of potential external reviewers.
The Office of Graduate Education will invite and make all travel arrangements (e.g., air fare, hotel, transportation to and from airport to hotel) for external reviewers.
The Review Team, an essential element to the Academic Review Process, will include:
The Review Team, an essential element to the Academic Review Process, will include:1. A program review committee monitor.
The Self-Study report is the principal document for the Academic Program Review. It should be a collective effort prepared by the faculty of the unit undergoing review. At its most basic level, the Self-Study report will be a descriptive and comprehensive evaluation of the unit that provides basic information on the program(s) of the unit and includes an assessment of the unit’s strengths and weaknesses. The Self-Study is submitted to The Office of Graduate Education and the Provost Office for disbursement to the review team prior to the site visit.
Academic units will be reviewed every 10 years. New programs will be reviewed 5 years after their initiation. The Office of Graduate Education will notify academic units undergoing review approximately one year before the scheduled review.
10-Year Review Schedule (.pdf)
This university committee maintains general oversight of the review process to assure its efficacy and uniformity. During each program review, one member of the Program Review Committee (PRC), designated the Program Review Committee Monitor, participates directly in the process. The entire Program Review Committee evaluates the operation of the review process on a continuing basis and makes an annual report to the Provost and Academic Senate. In this report, it recommends any modifications of policies or procedures regarding the review process. In addition, it consults with and advises the Provost on other aspects of Program Review as requested.
The membership of the PRC is comprised of six faculty members and four deans appointed by the President to two-year renewable terms. Members from the faculty are recommended by the Academic Senate after consultation with the Committee on Committees; deans are recommended by the Provost. Faculty should be drawn from the schools in which reviews will be conducted during the year of their service, or from the library if the library is to be reviewed. The Responsible University Official (RUO) is the Chief Academic Officer.
Julia W.P. Hsu, Ph.D.
William Manton, Ph.D.
Mihaela Stefan, Ph.D.
Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki, Ph.D.
Mark Lee, Ph.D.
Jessica C. Murphy, Ph.D.
Bruce Novak, Ph.D.
Anne Balsamo, Ph.D.
Stephanie G. Adams, Ph.D.
List of Past Program Reviews (.pdf) (secure access required)
How many external reviewers are selected to review our program and how they selected?
Doctoral program reviews will have at least two external reviewers. Stand-alone master’s reviews will have at least one external reviewer. Reviewers are recommended by the unit under review and the Program Review Committee and appointed by The Office of Graduate Education.
What expenses does the unit under review incur?
Expenses incurred by the program being reviewed should be at a minimum. All meals and travel funds are provided by the Office of the Provost.
How many copies of the self-study are we required to provide?
The self-study will be delivered electronically, thereby avoiding the need to provide printed copies of the report.
How long does it take to receive a report from the review committee?
The chair of the review team will provide a complete written report on the review team’s conclusions within 30 days of the on-site visit.
Who has access to view our department/program’s summary report? Can I view past review results?
UTD staff and faculty can view all department reviews in our secure access site.
If I have questions about the process or logistics of our review, who should I contact?